Ophthalmic Drug Discovery and Development: Regulatory Aspects of Patient Focused Drug Development in Ophthalmology.

In 2009, members of the ophthalmic research community held a joint meeting with members of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Eye Institute (NEI) to define and describe the types of patient-focused drug development (PFDD) tools used in ophthalmology. Since then numerous reports have been published which indicate that many of the questionnaires used for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in ophthalmic clinical development lack rigor and reliability according to modern methods. In 2017, the FDA began development of a series of four methodological guidances for sponsors of clinical trials on the significance of PFDD. The new guidances delineate the FDA's thinking and commitments under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act to implement a more structured approach to the assessment of risks and benefits in clinical trials. In these guidances, the FDA provides steps that drug and device manufacturers should follow, not only to obtain, but also to develop reliable and validated tools that measure patients' experience in clinical trials. Subsequent efforts have resulted in the development and validation of PROs specifically for ophthalmology. The purpose of this paper is to assesses the PROs currently used in ophthalmology and to provide practical strategies for incorporating them into clinical trials.

Making Basic Science Studies in Glaucoma More Clinically Relevant: The Need for a Consensus.

Glaucoma is a chronic, progressive, and debilitating optic neuropathy that causes retinal damage and visual defects. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of glaucoma remain ill-defined, and there is an indisputable need for contributions from basic science researchers in defining pathways for translational research. However, glaucoma researchers today face significant challenges due to the lack of a map of integrated pathways from bench to bedside and the lack of consensus statements to guide in choosing the right research questions, techniques, and model systems. Here, we present the case for the development of such maps and consensus statements, which are critical for faster development of the most efficacious glaucoma therapy. We underscore that interrogating the preclinical path of both successful and unsuccessful clinical programs is essential to defining future research. One aspect of this is evaluation of available preclinical research tools. To begin this process, we highlight the utility of currently available animal models for glaucoma and emphasize that there is a particular need for models of glaucoma with normal intraocular pressure. In addition, we outline a series of discoveries from cell-based, animal, and translational research that begin to reveal a map of glaucoma from cell biology to physiology to disease pathology. Completion of these maps requires input and consensus from the global glaucoma research community. This article sets the stage by outlining various approaches to such a consensus. Together, these efforts will help accelerate basic science research, leading to discoveries with significant clinical impact for people with glaucoma.

Ocular Hypotensive Effect of ONO-9054, an EP3/FP Receptor Agonist: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose Escalation Study.

PURPOSE: To assess pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of ONO-9054 following single and multiple day dosing in subjects with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase I, single-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study. Nine subjects were randomized to each of ONO-9054 3, 10, 20, 30 µg/mL and 12 to placebo. Subjects received a single drop to each eye at 07:00±30 minutes (single dose). Following a 4-day no-treatment period, subjects were dosed once daily for 14 consecutive days (multiple day dosing). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured regularly and compared with baseline measurements. Ocular examinations assessed safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Mean IOP decreased dose dependently. Following single dosing, IOP decreased from 22.9±4.0 to 15.9±2.3 mm Hg (ONO-9054, 30 µg/mL) at peak effect 9 hours postdose; the reduction in placebo-treated subjects was from 22.3±2.4 to 21.5±3.3 mm Hg. Following multiple day dosing, the greatest reduction in IOP occurred 1 hour postdose on day 18, from 23.3±0.6 to 15.1±2.4 mm Hg (ONO-9054, 10 µg/mL); the smallest reduction at this time was from 23.9±0.8 to 18.6±2.0 mm Hg (ONO-9054, 3 µg/mL). Pressures remained reduced on day 19, 25 hours after the last dose, when the lowest measurement was 15.8±2.1 mm Hg (ONO-9054, 10 µg/mL). Anterior uveitis and vitreous detachment were each reported in 2 subjects and considered moderate by the Investigator. Ocular hyperemia and tolerability symptoms were generally mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: ONO-9054 was well-tolerated and elicited dose-dependent reductions in IOP, which were sustained for at least 24 hours following 2 weeks of consecutive daily dosing.

A Novel Dual Agonist of EP3 and FP Receptors for OAG and OHT: Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of ONO-9054 in Healthy Volunteers.

PURPOSE: The use of a dual prostaglandin E3 (EP3) and prostaglandin F (FP) receptor agonist is a novel approach for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension and, as such, ONO-9054 may have benefits over existing therapies. The objectives of this phase I study were to assess the safety, tolerability, systemic pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles of ONO-9054 (Sepetoprost), the prodrug of ONO-AG-367, in healthy, normotensive adults. METHODS: In this randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalating study, 48 male and female healthy volunteers each received a single drop of ONO-9054 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 20.0, or 30.0 µg/mL, or matching placebo in each eye. Blood samples of PK were taken up to 24 hours post dose; ocular and systemic safety, tolerability, and PD assessments were conducted up to approximately 72 hours post dose, and on day 7 at the follow-up visit. RESULTS: We found ONO-9054 was safe and well tolerated and ONO-AG-367 exhibited dose-dependent systemic PK with rapid elimination. The effect of PD was assessed by reduction in IOP, with the maximum change from baseline in IOP in these normotensive individuals of -28.23% achieved at the 30.0 µg/mL dose at 9 hours post administration. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of the novel EP3 and FP receptor agonist ONO-9054 was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers at doses between 0.3 and 30.0 µg/mL and resulted in a significant reduction in intraocular IOP with maximum reduction at 9 hours post dose. This supports further evaluation of ONO-9054 for the treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01508988.).

Validation of molecular and genomic biomarkers of retinal drug efficacy: use of ocular fluid sampling to evaluate VEGF.

The use of tissue- and cell-based methods in developing drugs for retinal diseases is inefficient. Consequently, many aspects of ocular drug therapy for retinal diseases are poorly understood. Biomarkers as prognostic indicators of change are needed to optimize the use of drugs. VEGF is considered an important target of drug therapy and VEGF levels in tissue are indicative of solid tumor growth. However, since many aspects of VEGF as a biomarker of ocular disease have not been validated, it has been difficult to ascertain without invasive procedures whether VEGF in the eye is a biomarker of response to drug therapy. Using published papers, registered clinical trials, and proteomic databases we assessed the earlier evidence for VEGF as an exploratory biomarker of proliferative and vasculopathic disease of the retina and asked whether the molecule has been rigorously validated in clinical trials. The emerging use of aqueous humor sampling has made it possible to explore biomarkers in oculo, and determine whether they are predictive of drug efficacy. We present data supporting the use of aqueous humor to validate drug-signaling pathways and biomarkers in the eye. In addition, we recommend convening a collaborative congress to help standardize the identification, validation, and use of biomarkers in retinal disease.